ReviewPharmaceutics2022
Inorganic Nanoparticles in Bone Healing Applications.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Hydroxyapatite Nanocarriers for Targeted and Enhanced Osteoporosis Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Targeting ferroptosis in osteoporosis: mechanisms and natural products therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials in osteoarthritis therapy: advances in drug delivery, tissue regeneration, and implant engineering.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Co-Delivery of Ca-MOF and Mg-MOF Using Nanoengineered Hydrogels to Promote In Situ Mineralization and Bone Defect Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Reactive Magnetron-Sputtered Tantalum-Copper Nitride Coatings: Structure, Electrical Anisotropy, and Antibacterial Behavior.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nanobody conjugated with dendrimer nanoparticles effectively neutralizes tick-borne encephalitis virus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel Nanomaterials for Developing Bone Scaffolds and Tissue Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Scaffolds and Drug Delivery Systems in Treatment of Osteoporosis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Dental Implant Applications.International dental journal · 2025Review
- Nanotopographical Features of Polymeric Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Leveraging Nanoscience and Strategic Delivery for the Expedition of Osteoporosis.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Nanostructures in Orthopedics: Advancing Diagnostics, Targeted Therapies, and Tissue Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Regenerative potential of mesoporous silica nanoparticles scaffold on dental pulp and root maturation in immature dog's teeth: a histologic and radiographic study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Transforming Healthcare with Nanomedicine: A SWOT Analysis of Drug Delivery Innovation.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- An update on the advances in the field of nanostructured drug delivery systems for a variety of orthopedic applications.Drug delivery · 2023Article
- Osteoimmune Properties of Mesoporous Bioactive Nanospheres: A Study on T Helper Lymphocytes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electrospun Fibrous Silica for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Using Femtosecond Laser Light-Activated Materials: The Biomimetic Dentin Remineralization Was Monitored by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Advanced Hydrogel systems for mandibular reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Biological Scaffolds Assembled with Magnetic Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern biomedicine aims to develop integrated solutions that use medical, biotechnological, materials science, and engineering concepts to create functional alternatives for the specific, selective, and accurate management of medical conditions. In the particular case of tissue engineering, designing a model that simulates all tissue qualities and fulfills all tissue requirements is a continuous challenge in the field of bone regeneration. The therapeutic protocols used for bone healing applications are limited by the hierarchical nature and extensive vascularization of osseous tissue, especially in large bone lesions. In this regard, nanotechnology paves the way for a new era in bone treatment, repair and regeneration, by enabling the fabrication of complex nanostructures that are similar to those found in the natural bone and which exhibit multifunctional bioactivity. This review aims to lay out the tremendous outcomes of using inorganic nanoparticles in bone healing applications, including bone repair and regeneration, and modern therapeutic strategies for bone-related pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.