Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456566›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Modernising Orodispersible Film Characterisation to Improve Palatability and Acceptability Using a Toolbox of Techniques.

Neel Desai, Marc Masen, Philippa Cann, Ben Hanson, Catherine Tuleu, Mine Orlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neel DesaiResearch Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-2549
Marc MasenTribology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 9AG, UK.
Philippa CannTribology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 9AG, UK.
Ben HansonUCL Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4661-6778
Catherine TuleuResearch Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-357X
Mine OrluResearch Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2047-5025

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/L01646X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orodispersible films (ODFs) have been widely used in paediatric, geriatric and dysphagic patients due to ease of administration and precise and flexible dose adjustments. ODF fabrication has seen significant advancements with the move towards more technologically advanced production methods. The acceptability of ODFs is dependent upon film composition and process of formation, which affects disintegration, taste, texture and mouthfeel. There is currently a lack of testing to accurately assess ODFs for these important acceptability sensory perceptions. This study produced four ODFs formed of polyvinyl alcohol and sodium carboxymethylcellulose using 3D printing. These were assessed using three in vitro methods: Petri dish and oral cavity model (OCM) methods for disintegration and bio-tribology for disintegration and oral perception. Increasing polymer molecular weight (MW) exponentially increased disintegration time in the Petri dish and OCM methods. Higher MW films adhered to the OCM upper palate. Bio-tribology analysis showed that films of higher MW disintegrated quickest and had lower coefficient of friction, perhaps demonstrating good oral perception but also stickiness, with higher viscosity. These techniques, part of a toolbox, may enable formulators to design, test and reformulate ODFs that both disintegrate rapidly and may be better perceived when consumed, improving overall treatment acceptability.

Indexed as

3D printingacceptabilitybio-tribologydisintegration testingmouthfeelorodispersible films

Identifiers

PMID35456566
PMCPMC9029462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.