Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456367›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Genetic Analysis of Novel Behaviour Traits in Pigs Derived from Social Network Analysis.

Saif Agha, Simone Foister, Rainer Roehe, Simon P Turner, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saif AghaThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-146X
Simone FoisterAnimal and Veterinary Sciences Department, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.
Rainer RoeheAnimal and Veterinary Sciences Department, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.
Simon P TurnerAnimal and Veterinary Sciences Department, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9198-9448
Andrea Doeschl-WilsonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) has provided novel traits that describe the role of individual pigs in aggression. The objectives were to (1) estimate the genetic parameters for these SNA traits, (2) quantify the genetic association between SNA and skin lesion traits, and (3) investigate the possible response to selection for SNA traits on skin lesion traits. Pigs were video recorded for 24 h post-mixing. The observed fight and bullying behaviour of each animal was used as input for the SNA. Skin lesions were counted on different body parts at 24 h (SL24h) and 3 weeks (SL3wk) post-mixing. A Bayesian approach estimated the genetic parameters of SNA traits and their association with skin lesions. SNA traits were heritable (h2 = 0.09 to 0.26) and strongly genetically correlated (rg > 0.88). Positive genetic correlations were observed between all SNA traits and anterior SL24h, except for clustering coefficient. Our results suggest that selection for an index that combines the eigenvector centrality and clustering coefficient could potentially decrease SL24h and SL3wk compared to selection for each trait separately. This study provides a first step towards potential integration of SNA traits into a multi-trait selection index for improving pigs’ welfare.

Indexed as

Skin DiseasesSocial Network AnalysisAggressionAnimalsBayes TheoremPhenotypeSwineaggressivenessgenetic parameterspigssocial network analysiswelfare

Identifiers

PMID35456367
PMCPMC9027576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.