ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Effects of Common Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Pancreas Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of the Art in Pancreatic Surgery: Some Unanswered Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Maintenance of postoperative graft flow is important in pancreas transplantation. In Japan, reconstruction of the common hepatic artery is performed primarily to increase perfusion in the pancreatic head. We investigated the effects of common hepatic artery reconstruction on patient and graft survival and endocrine functions. Twenty-nine cases of pancreas transplantation were registered in the clinical trial. Of the 29 cases, four were excluded because of the risk of ischemia without reconstruction or complicated reconstruction due to a narrow artery. A total of 25 cases were randomized into two groups: 13 in the non-reconstructed group and 12 in the reconstructed group. The 1-year patient survival and graft survival rates of the non-reconstructed and reconstructed groups were 92.3% and 83.3%, and 91.7% and 82.5%, respectively. The incidence of complications in the two groups was comparable, with 38.5% (5/13 cases) in the non-reconstructed group and 33.3% (4/12 cases) in the reconstructed group. The results of the glucagon stimulation test and oral glucose tolerance test at 1 month and 1 year post-transplantation were comparable. Common hepatic artery reconstruction is not essential unless there is risk of ischemia. This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry under UMIN000027213.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.