Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456273›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Initial Experience with Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Grafts Using 3D Aortic Templates.

Paweł Rynio, Tomasz Jedrzejczak, Anita Rybicka, Ross Milner, Piotr Gutowski, Arkadiusz Kazimierczak

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06585215 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Expert Survey, Interactive Case Planning, and Modified Delphi Consensus: A Comprehensive Approach to Define Standards for Physician-Modified Stent Grafts in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

TypeobservationalSponsorEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale, BellinzonaRan2014 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Endovascular Procedures, Stents, Vascular Surgical Procedures
NCT06969729 narecruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Aortal Stent-graft Modelled Printing 3D Model Printing Technology - Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 2 PUMRan2022 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal Aortic AneurysmArmsPhysician-Modified Fenestrated Stent-Graft (3D-Printed Template-Guided)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paweł RynioDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3365-1822
Tomasz JedrzejczakDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Anita RybickaDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
Ross MilnerCenter for Aortic Diseases, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Piotr GutowskiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Arkadiusz KazimierczakDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-927X
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe the surgical results of physician-modified endografts (PMEG) utilizing a 3D aortic template in a center with no prior experience in complex endovascular aortic repairs. Forty-three patients underwent physician-modified graft stent implantation using a 3D aortic model. The inclusion criteria were juxtarenal and suprarenal aortic aneurysms, type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, and type IA endoleak after endovascular aortic repair. In asymptomatic patients, the diameter threshold for aneurysm repair was 5.5 cm in males and 5.0 cm in females. 3D aortic templates were prepared from the patient's computed tomography angiography scans and sterilized before use in the operating suite. Forty-three stent grafts were modified with the use of a 3D printing template. A total of 162 reinforced fenestrations (37 celiac, 43 right renal, 39 left renal, 43 superior mesenteric) with a mean of 3.8 per patient were performed. All PMEGs had a posterior reducing-diameter tie and a preloaded guidewire. The mean modification time was 86 ± 12 min. The mean follow-up was 14 ± 12 months. The 30-day mortality was 12%. During the follow-up period, the patency rate was 95% per the superior mesenteric artery, 93% per right renal artery, 95% per left renal artery, and 89% per celiac trunk. Twelve (28%) patients had endoleak, of which type I or III was present in 5 (12%) patients, and type II in 7 (16%). 3D printing can be successfully integrated into the physician's everyday practice of stent graft modification. However, the use of this approach in centers without experience performing complex aortic procedures results in worse surgical metrics than those previously reported.

Indexed as

3D model3D printing3D templatecomplex aortic procedurefenestrated endovascular repairphysician-modified stent graft

Identifiers

PMID35456273
PMCPMC9027705
OpenAlexW4224095183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.