Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456184›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

A Therapeutic Pathway in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: Proposal for Optimization.

Raffaele De Caterina, Paolo Calabrò, Gianluca Campo, Roberta Rossini, Simona Giubilato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Raffaele De CaterinaChair of Cardiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1637-574X
Paolo CalabròDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5018-830X
Gianluca CampoCardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Sant'Anna a Cona, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-188X
Roberta RossiniCardiology Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Simona GiubilatoCardiology-Coronary Care Unit-Cath Lab Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, 95126 Catania, Italy.
Arcispedale Sant'Anna · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is uncertainty in cardiologists’ attitudes for prolonging dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor 60 mg beyond 12 months in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. We aimed at characterizing the Italian cardiologists’ perceptions and needs in the management of such patients. Two consecutive questionnaires were proposed between June and November 2021, and compiled by 122 and 87 Cardiologists, respectively. Agreement among cardiologists was defined as either a >70% frequency of concordant responses relative to total respondents or following the Delphi method as developed by the RAND Corporation. An agreement was reached on the indication of ticagrelor as the first choice P2Y12 inhibitor in MI patients, irrespective of the presentation [ST elevation MI (STEMI), 72%, vs. non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), 71%] or the management [invasive vs. conservative (75%)]. A consensus was also achieved on the possibility to consider a patient suitable for long-term DAPT with ticagrelor 60 mg even in case of another P2Y12 inhibitor used in the first year after the acute event (74, 85%). To define ischemic and bleeding risks, a consensus was reached on the utilization of one or more scores (87, 71%).

Indexed as

dual antiplatelet therapymyocardial infarctionticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID35456184
PMCPMC9028169
OpenAlexW4224256000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.