Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456181›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Real-Time Spiral CMR Is Superior to Conventional Segmented Cine-Imaging for Left-Ventricular Functional Assessment in Patients with Arrhythmia.

Nicoleta Nita, Johannes Kersten, Alexander Pott, Fabian Weber, Temsgen Tesfay, Marius-Tudor Benea, Patrick Metze, Hao Li, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Volker Rasche and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Simultaneous multi-slice cardiac real-time MRI at 0.55T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. The future of CMR: All-in-one vs. real-time CMR (Part 2).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicoleta NitaDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Johannes KerstenDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-9977
Alexander PottDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Fabian WeberDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Temsgen TesfayDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Marius-Tudor BeneaFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University, 550169 Sibiu, Romania.
Patrick MetzeDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-514X
Hao LiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang RottbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Volker RascheDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-3583
Dominik BuckertDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DELucian Blaga University of Sibiu · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Segmented Cartesian Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) often fails to deliver robust assessment of cardiac function in patients with arrhythmia. We aimed to assess the performance of a tiny golden-angle spiral real-time CMR sequence at 1.5 T for left-ventricular (LV) volumetry in patients with irregular heart rhythm; (2) Methods: We validated the real-time sequence against the standard breath-hold segmented Cartesian sequence in 32 patients, of whom 11 presented with arrhythmia. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were assessed. In arrhythmic patients, real-time and standard Cartesian acquisitions were compared against a reference echocardiographic modality; (3) Results: In patients with sinus rhythm, good agreements and correlations were found between the segmented and real-time methods, with only minor, non-significant underestimation of EDV for the real-time sequence (135.95 ± 30 mL vs. 137.15 ± 31,

Indexed as

CMR in atrial fibrillationCMR volumetry in arrhythmiareal-time CMRspiral real-time CMR

Identifiers

PMID35456181
PMCPMC9025940
OpenAlexW4224263281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.