Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456167›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Old and New Drugs for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Lights and Shadows of Real-World Evidence.

Monia Marchetti, Candida Vitale, Gian Matteo Rigolin, Alessandra Vasile, Andrea Visentin, Lydia Scarfò, Marta Coscia, Antonio Cuneo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Monia MarchettiHaematology and Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7615-0572
Candida VitaleHematology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2592-8724
Gian Matteo RigolinHaematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-5190
Alessandra VasileDepartment of Public Health, University of Eastern Pedemont, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Andrea VisentinHematology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-7200
Lydia ScarfòDivision of Experimental Oncology, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Marta CosciaHematology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2123-7675
Antonio CuneoHaematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Padua · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several novel treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been recently approved based on the results of randomized clinical trials. However, real-world evidence (RWE) is also requested before and after drug authorization in order to confirm safety and to provide data for health technology assessments. We conducted a scoping review of the available RWE for targeted treatments of CLL, namely ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax, as well as for chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). In particular, we searched studies published since 1 January 2010 and reported outcomes of the above treatments based on health databases, registries, or phase IV studies, including named-patient programs. We included both full papers and abstracts of studies presented at major meetings. Overall, 110 studies were selected and analyzed: 28,880 patients were treated with ibrutinib, 1424 with idelalisib, 751 with venetoclax, 496 with acalabrutinib, and 14,896 with CIT. Reported discontinuation rates were higher than in clinical trials, while effectiveness could not be indirectly compared with clinical trials since a detailed case mix, including cytogenetic risk factors, was partially available and propensity scores rarely applied. RWE on CLL can help to set realistic outcomes with novel treatments, however, real-world studies should be fostered, and available data shared.

Indexed as

acalabrutinibchronic lymphocytic leukemiaibrutinibidelalisibreal-world evidencevenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID35456167
PMCPMC9028394
OpenAlexW4224302256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.