ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Neuropsychological Outcomes in Adult Patients and Survivors of COVID-19.
Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive functions in COVID-19 survivors, approaches strategies, and impact on health systems: a qualitative systematic review.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Characterization of Change in Cognition Before and After COVID-19 Infection in Essential Workers at Midlife.American journal of medicine open · 2024Article
- A Step Forward in Long COVID Research: Validating the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024Article
- Microstructural brain abnormalities, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction after mild COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A multimodal group-based immersive virtual reality intervention for improving cognition and mental health in patients with post-covid-19 condition. A quasi-experimental design study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Addressing Long COVID Sequelae and Neurocovid: Neuropsychological Scenarios and Neuroimaging Findings.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF COVID-19 RELATED COGNITIVE DECLINE: RESULTS FROM A NATURAL EXPERIMENT.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Cognitive Impairment 13 Months After Hospitalization for COVID-19.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Pros and cons of remote medical education in Ukraine in terms of COVID-19 pandemics.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
- Highlighting the Neuropsychological Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence From a Narrative Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is believed to affect central nervous system functions through various indirect, and possibly direct, mechanisms. We are only now beginning to understand the possible effects of the virus on human cognition. This review summarizes extant yet limited literature on clinical neuropsychological findings in adult coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and survivors. Neuropsychological outcomes were often in the form of cognitive screen results, although various studies administered comprehensive batteries. With respect to screens, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment appeared relatively sensitive to cognitive dysfunction associated with COVID-19. Patients and survivors presented with weaknesses on screens and comprehensive batteries, although the pattern of these weaknesses was not specific to etiology. Broadly, weaknesses were suggestive of executive dysfunction, although more than one study did not detect significant impairment. Weaknesses should be interpreted cautiously due to potential confounds/contributing factors (weaknesses may partly reflect psychiatric sequelae; weaknesses may be over-interpreted due to inadequate assessment of premorbid functioning). Studies reported different approaches in defining impairment, likely contributing to variable findings. The current review discusses ongoing efforts to harmonize approaches to evaluating neuropsychological functioning globally, as well as emphasizes taking a comprehensive approach towards understanding how the disease affects cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.