Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456064›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Advances in Childhood Tuberculosis-Improving Specimen Collection and Yield of Microbiological Diagnosis for Intrathoracic Tuberculosis.

Eric Wobudeya, Maryline Bonnet, Elisabetta Ghimenton Walters, Pamela Nabeta, Rinn Song, Wilfred Murithi, Walter Mchembere, Bunnet Dim, Jean-Voisin Taguebue, Joanna Orne-Gliemann and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Eric WobudeyaMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU-JHU) Care Ltd., Kampala P.O. Box 7072, Uganda.
Maryline BonnetUniversity of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, TransVIH MI, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-7393
Elisabetta Ghimenton WaltersDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Pamela NabetaFIND, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Rinn SongOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX 7LEe, UK.
Wilfred MurithiCenter for Respiratory Disease Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Walter MchembereCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu 40100, Kenya.
Bunnet DimEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Pasteur Institute in Cambodia, Phnom Penh 12201, Cambodia.
Jean-Voisin TaguebueMother and Child Center, Chantal Biya Foundation, Yaoundé P.O. Box 1936, Cameroon.
Joanna Orne-GliemannUniversity of Bordeaux, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Team GHiGS, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Mark P NicolDivision of Infection and Immunity, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Olivier MarcyUniversity of Bordeaux, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Team GHiGS, 33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3350-112X
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversité de Bordeaux · FRCentre International De Reference Chantal Biya · CMDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAFIND · CHInserm · FRInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KHMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no microbiological gold standard for childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. The paucibacillary nature of the disease, challenges in sample collection in young children, and the limitations of currently available microbiological tests restrict microbiological confirmation of intrathoracic TB to the minority of children. Recent WHO guidelines recommend the use of novel rapid molecular assays as initial diagnostic tests for TB and endorse alternative sample collection methods for children. However, the uptake of these tools in high-endemic settings remains low. In this review, we appraise historic and new microbiological tests and sample collection techniques that can be used for the diagnosis of intrathoracic TB in children. We explore challenges and possible ways to improve diagnostic yield despite limitations, and identify research gaps to address in order to improve the microbiological diagnosis of intrathoracic TB in children.

Indexed as

childrendiagnosismicrobiological testssample collection methodstuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35456064
PMCPMC9025862
OpenAlexW4221005966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.