Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455892›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comparison of Nursing and Pharmacy Students' Perceptions of an Acute Care Simulation.

Jill Pence, Shannon Ashe, Georges Adunlin, Jennifer Beall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jill PenceCollege of Health Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA.
Shannon AsheCollege of Health Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-5648
Georges AdunlinMcWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA.
Jennifer BeallMcWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-5741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient outcomes are improved when healthcare professionals work collaboratively. In order for future professionals to have these entry-level skills, students from different disciplines must work together in scenarios simulating patient care. This paper provides an overview of a large-scale, acute care simulation involving students of different disciplines, including nursing and pharmacy. A survey using the validated Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education Revised (SPICE-R2) tool was administered to students participating in the simulation prior to and within 1 week of the simulation. There were between-group statistically significant differences on two items on the pre-simulation survey and two items on the post-simulation survey. Student participants reported more positive perceptions after the simulation on every item except for "During their education, health professional students should be involved in teamwork with students from other health professions to understand their perspective roles". The authors concluded that an interprofessional acute care simulation allowed students in both professions to recognize the value of a team approach to patient care.

Indexed as

acute carehigh fidelityinterprofessionalnursingpharmacysimulationSPICE-R2standardized patientsstudents

Identifiers

PMID35455892
PMCPMC9025205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.