Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455849›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Augmented Reality in Radiology for Education and Training-A Design Study.

Alexander Raith, Christoph Kamp, Christina Stoiber, Andreas Jakl, Markus Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Applications and Challenges of Virtual Reality in Medical Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander RaithDepartment of Health Sciences-Radiologic Technology FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, 1100 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-9172
Christoph KampDepartment of Health Sciences-Radiologic Technology FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, 1100 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-1185
Christina StoiberInstitute of Creative Media Technologies, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1764-1467
Andreas JaklInstitute of Creative Media Technologies, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-8494
Markus WagnerInstitute of Creative Media Technologies, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6619-6494
University of Applied Sciences St Pölten · ATHochschule Campus Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Education is an important component of every healthcare system. Patients need to be educated about their planned procedures; healthcare professionals need to be trained in their respective profession. Both patient education and the training of healthcare professionals are often completed in person, which requires resources and is bound to certain times and places. Virtual educational environments can potentially save human and monetary resources, increase learner engagement, and enable users to learn according to their own schedules. This design study describes proofs of concept for two augmented reality-enabled (AR) educational tools, utilizing a Microsoft HoloLens head-mounted display. In the first use case, we demonstrate an AR application which could be used to educate cancer patients about their radiotherapy treatment and potentially reduce patient anxiety. The second use case demonstrates an AR training environment, which could complement the practical training of undergraduate radiography students. Two prototypes-VIPER, for patient education, and ARTUR for the training of radiography students-were developed and tested for viability and usability, both based on individual user tests. Both patient and student education were evaluated as viable and usable additions to conventional educational methods, despite being limited in terms of accessibility, usability, and fidelity. Suitable hardware is becoming more accessible and capable, and higher-fidelity holograms, better utilization of real-world objects, and more intuitive input methods could increase user immersion and acceptance of the technology.

Indexed as

augmented realitydesign studymixed reality(patient) educationradiology

Identifiers

PMID35455849
PMCPMC9031241
OpenAlexW4224321273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.