Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455847›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effects of High-Intensity Functional Training on Cognition in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Yulieth Rivas-Campo, Patricia Alexandra García-Garro, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Antonio Martínez-Amat, Gloria Cecilia Vega-Ávila, Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo, Felipe León-Morillas, Fidel Hita-Contreras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Dose-response relationship of high-intensity training on global cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review with meta-analysis - the ACHIEVE-Study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yulieth Rivas-CampoFaculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of San Buenaventura-Cali, Santiago de Cali 760016, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-5304
Patricia Alexandra García-GarroSchool by Faculty of Distance Learning and Virtual Education, Antonio José Camacho University Institution, Santiago de Cali 760016, Colombia.
Agustín Aibar-AlmazánDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-9199
Antonio Martínez-AmatDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9652-791X
Gloria Cecilia Vega-ÁvilaSchool by Faculty of Distance Learning and Virtual Education, Antonio José Camacho University Institution, Santiago de Cali 760016, Colombia.
Diego Fernando Afanador-RestrepoSchool for Faculty of Health Sciences, University Foundation of the Área Andina-Pereira, Pereira 660004, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-0751
Felipe León-MorillasDepartment of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Murcia UCAM, 30107 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-379X
Fidel Hita-ContrerasDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7215-5456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) is a new exercise modality that emphasizes multi-joint functional movements adaptable to any fitness level and promotes greater muscle recruitment. Previous studies have evaluated the positive effects of HIFT on mental and cognitive health but have not evaluated it in older people. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of HIFT on general cognition in older adults with cognitive impairment. (2) Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, articles that did a high-intensity functional physical exercise intervention on cognitive performance in older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment (MMSE > 10) or dementia, aged 55 years or older, published between 2011 and 2021 in five different electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane plus were included. (3) Results: 7 articles were included, all having general cognition as their primary outcome. All assessed general cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination, the ADAS-Cog, or both. All studies had at least one HIFT experimental group with a frequency of 2 sessions per week and a variable duration between protocols of 12, 13, 16, and 26 weeks. Two articles showed that a progressive HIFT program improves general cognition, four articles showed no significant changes within or between groups and one article concluded that a HIFT intervention does not slow cognitive decline. (4) Conclusions: Evidence exists of the benefits of HIFT on general cognition in older adults with cognitive impairment, assessed using the MMSE, the ADAS-cog, or both. Two articles that showed improvement in cognitive function used progressive HIFT with 80% RM at 6, 12, and 1 weeks; however, in the other articles, due to the heterogeneity of intervention protocols, measurement time points, and control group activities, mixed results were evidenced

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentgeneral cognitionhigh-intensity functional exerciseolder adultsrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID35455847
PMCPMC9025277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.