ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Co-Produce, Co-Design, Co-Create, or Co-Construct-Who Does It and How Is It Done in Chronic Disease Prevention? A Scoping Review.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- eHealth Solutions for Symptom Assessment and Monitoring in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Pooled it
- How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing the Impact of Behavioral Sciences Interventions on Chronic Disease Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Characteristics and Effectiveness of Co-Designed Mental Health Interventions in Primary Care for People Experiencing Homelessness: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Performing lifestyle changes and reducing stroke risk: a process evaluation of a stroke prevention intervention.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- Fatigue and Driving Safety in Early Parenthood: Developing Feasible Risk-Reduction Strategies Through Co-Design.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Sailing Into Uncharted Territory: Victim Survivors' Perspectives on Some of the Tensions of Engagement as Partners in Co-Design Research.Violence against women · 2026Article
- Co-Developed Community-Based Health Interventions with Children Under 18 and Families Experiencing Homelessness in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Involving community members in designing behavioural weight management programmes: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Adolescents' understanding of pain and their preferences for learning about pain at school: a cross-sectional survey.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluating co-design processes used in the development of healthcare interventions in residential aged care: a scoping review.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Embedding coproduction: translational impacts of a sustained research-policy coalition in Tasmania, Australia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- COmmunities Facilitating incREasing Smoke-free Homes (CO-FRESH): co-developing a toolkit with local stakeholders in Indonesia and Malaysia.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Participatory Development of Digital Innovations for Health Promotion Among Older Adults: Qualitative Insights on Individual, Contextual, and Technical Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Co-Design for Developing and Integrating a Model of Care for Pain Management Centers: Protocol for a Biphase Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Adapting Experience-Based Co-Design to Disability Research: Co-Producing the CycLink Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Refining the Make My Day stroke prevention intervention for primary healthcare through co-creation with stakeholders.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Exploring a Co-Designed Approach for Healthcare Quality Improvement-Learning Through Developmental Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Grand challenge: addressing the global challenge of healthy aging.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-production in health literature has increased in recent years. Despite mounting interest, numerous terms are used to describe co-production. There is confusion regarding its use in health promotion and little evidence and guidance for using co-produced chronic disease prevention interventions in the general population. We conducted a scoping review to examine the research literature using co-production to develop and evaluate chronic disease prevention programs. We searched four electronic databases for articles using co-production for health behaviour change in smoking, physical activity, diet, and/or weight management. In 71 articles that reported using co-production, co-design, co-create, co-develop, and co-construct, these terms were used interchangeably to refer to a participatory process involving researchers, stakeholders, and end users of interventions. Overall, studies used co-production as a formative research process, including focus groups and interviews. Co-produced health promotion interventions were generally not well described or robustly evaluated, and the literature did not show whether co-produced interventions achieved better outcomes than those that were not. Uniform agreement on the meanings of these words would avoid confusion about their use, facilitating the development of a co-production framework for health promotion interventions. Doing so would allow practitioners and researchers to develop a shared understanding of the co-production process and how best to evaluate co-produced interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.