ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022
Should Neurosurgeons Try to Preserve Non-Traditional Brain Networks? A Systematic Review of the Neuroscientific Evidence.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Parcellation-based tractographic modeling of the salience network through meta-analysis.Brain and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Brain state theory as a comprehensive model for addressing the "non-eloquent" brain in glioma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the safety profile of connectome-based repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
- From Neural Networks to Emotional Networks: A Systematic Review of EEG-Based Emotion Recognition in Cognitive Neuroscience and Real-World Applications.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Understanding treatment preferences and cognitive outcomes in patients with gliomas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Discernible interindividual patterns of global efficiency decline during theoretical brain surgery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Simpson's Grading Scale for WHO Grade I Meningioma Resection in the Modern Neurosurgical Era: Are We Really Asking the Right Question?Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2024Article
- The Brain Connectome for Clinical Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Parcellation-Based Connectivity Model of the Judgement Core.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Functional connectivity reveals different brain networks underlying the idiopathic foreign accent syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Non-traditional cognitive brain network involvement in insulo-Sylvian gliomas: a case series study and clinical experience using Quicktome.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2023Article
- Quantitative assessments of finger individuation with an instrumented glove.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Large-scale lesion symptom mapping of depression identifies brain regions for risk and resilience.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Topology of the lateral visual system: The fundus of the superior temporal sulcus and parietal area H connect nonvisual cerebrum to the lateral occipital lobe.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Standardizing connectome-based brain tumor surgery through a network-based surgical nomenclature.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Presurgical Executive Functioning in Low-Grade Glioma Patients Cannot Be Topographically Mapped.Cancers · 2023Article
- Review
- Connectomic insight into unique stroke patient recovery after rTMS treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Large-scale brain networks and intra-axial tumor surgery: a narrative review of functional mapping techniques, critical needs, and scientific opportunities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Neurosurgical Clinical Trials for Glioblastoma: Current and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of large-scale brain networks in higher-order human functioning is well established in neuroscience, but has yet to deeply penetrate neurosurgical thinking due to concerns of clinical relevance. Here, we conducted the first systematic review examining the clinical importance of non-traditional, large-scale brain networks, including the default mode (DMN), central executive (CEN), salience (SN), dorsal attention (DAN), and ventral attention (VAN) networks. Studies which reported evidence of neurologic, cognitive, or emotional deficits in relation to damage or dysfunction in these networks were included. We screened 22,697 articles on PubMed, and 551 full-text articles were included and examined. Cognitive deficits were the most common symptom of network disturbances in varying amounts (36-56%), most frequently related to disruption of the DMN (n = 213) or some combination of DMN, CEN, and SN networks (n = 182). An increased proportion of motor symptoms was seen with CEN disruption (12%), and emotional (35%) or language/speech deficits (24%) with SN disruption. Disruption of the attention networks (VAN/DAN) with each other or the other networks mostly led to cognitive deficits (56%). A large body of evidence is available demonstrating the clinical importance of non-traditional, large-scale brain networks and suggests the need to preserve these networks is relevant for neurosurgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.