ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Metagenomic Analysis of Plasma Microbial Extracellular Vesicles in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial extracellular vesicles in the lung: friends in health, agents in disease.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Role of probiotic extracellular vesicles in inter-kingdom communication and current technical limitations in advancing their therapeutic utility.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies reported a significant association between pneumonia outcome and the respiratory microbiome. There is increasing interest in the roles of bacterial extracellular vesicles (EVs) in various diseases. We studied the composition and function of microbiota-derived EVs in the plasma of patients receiving mechanical ventilation to evaluate whether they can be used as a diagnostic marker and to predict clinical outcomes.
methodsPlasma samples (
resultsPrincipal coordinates analysis revealed significantly different clustering of microbial EVs between the pneumonia and non-pneumonia groups. The proportions of
conclusionsBacterial microbiota-derived EVs in the plasma have potential as diagnostic and prognostic markers for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Further large prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of plasma microbiota-EVs in intubated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.