Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455678›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Family Risk Factors That Jeopardize Child Development: Scoping Review.

Aida Simões, Saudade Lopes, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe, Júlio Belo Fernandes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aida SimõesEscola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Saudade LopesCenter for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechcare), School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Maria Dos Anjos DixeCenter for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechcare), School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-8548
Júlio Belo FernandesEscola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-7339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obligation to protect children is defined by law. However, there is fragility in identifying actual or potential situations that jeopardize their development. This review aims to identify the family risk factors that jeopardize child development. A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence-Based Practice framework and the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The research was carried out on the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing & Allied Health Collection: Comprehensive, MEDLINE Complete, and MedicLatina, with a time limit of 2010 to 2021. The search was restricted to documents written in Portuguese, English, and French. A total of 3998 articles were initially identified. After selecting and analysing, 28 risk factors were extracted from 29 articles. Four categories of risk factors were identified-namely, patterns of social and economic interaction, family characteristics, caregiver's characteristics, and parenting. The results of this review allow the identification of family risk factors that jeopardize child development. This is significant for Child Protective Services workers as they carry out their risk assessments. This assessment is the first step in avoiding an accumulation of harm to at-risk children and allowing the development of interventions for minimising harm's impact on children's development.

Indexed as

caregiverschildchild abusechild protective servicesfamilymaltreatmentneglectrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35455678
PMCPMC9029255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.