Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455305›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Booster Vaccination by CoronaVac or BNT162b2 in Previously Two-Dose Inactivated Virus Vaccinated Individuals with Negative Neutralizing Antibody.

Kristi Tsz-Wan Lai, Emilie Yuen-Ting Lai Wan Loong, Terry Ling-Hiu Fung, Luke Wing-Pan Luk, Chor-Chiu Lau, Jonpaul Sze-Tsing Zee, Edmond Shiu-Kwan Ma, Bone Siu-Fai Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristi Tsz-Wan LaiDepartment of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-4124
Emilie Yuen-Ting Lai Wan LoongDepartment of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Terry Ling-Hiu FungResearch Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Luke Wing-Pan LukResearch Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Chor-Chiu LauHospital Administration, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Jonpaul Sze-Tsing ZeeDepartment of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Edmond Shiu-Kwan MaDepartment of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-2205
Bone Siu-Fai TangDepartment of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has swept across the globe since 2019 and repeated waves of infection have been caused by different variants of the original SARS-CoV-2 (wild type), with the Omicron and Delta variants having dominated recently. Vaccination is among the most important measures in the absence of widespread use of antivirals for prevention of morbidity and mortality. Inactivated virus vaccine has been abundantly used in many countries as the primary two-dose regimen. We aim to study the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac (three-dose inactivated virus vaccine) and the BNT162b2 (two-dose inactivated virus vaccine followed by an mRNA vaccine) booster. Both CoronaVac and BNT162b2 boosters are generally safe and have good immunogenicity against the wild type SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta variant with the majority having neutralizing antibodies (NAb) on day 30 and day 90. However, the BNT162b2 booster is associated with a much higher proportion of positive NAb against the Omicron variant. Only 8% of day 30 and day 90 samples post CoronaVac booster have NAb against the Omicron variant. In addition, more BNT162b2 booster recipients are having positive T-cell responses using interferon gamma release assay. In places using inactivated virus vaccine as the primary two-dose scheme, the heterologous mRNA vaccine booster is safe and more immunogenic against the Omicron variant and should be considered as a preferred option during the current outbreak.

Indexed as

boosterCOVID-19heterologous vaccinationinactivated virus vaccinemRNA vaccineneutralizing antibodyvariants

Identifiers

PMID35455305
PMCPMC9025305
OpenAlexW4224326241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.