Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455297›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

From Concept to Clinical Product: A Brief History of the Novel

K Ross Turbyfill, Kristen A Clarkson, Edwin V Oaks, Robert W Kaminski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Development of a NovelVaccines · 2026
    Article
  3. Vaccines · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A Candidate AcVaccines · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TestingPharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Designing a multi-epitope vaccine againstFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Reassessing potential economic value and health impact of effectiveBulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  17. Development of themSphere · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Toward aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K Ross TurbyfillDepartment of Diarrheal Disease Research, Bacterial Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-0370
Kristen A ClarksonDepartment of Diarrheal Disease Research, Bacterial Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Edwin V OaksPatuxent Research and Consulting Group, Gambrills, Gambrills, MD 21054, USA.
Robert W KaminskiDepartment of Diarrheal Disease Research, Bacterial Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-5694
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

adjuvantantibodyimmunogenicityInvaplexShigellavaccine

Identifiers

PMID35455297
PMCPMC9025769
OpenAlexW4224311901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.