Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455293›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Cognition and Behavior of COVID-19 Vaccination Based on the Health Belief Model: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zemin Cai, Wei Hu, Shukai Zheng, Xilin Wen, Kusheng Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness among Young Adults in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Cessation of Face Mask Use after COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Diabetes: Prevalence and Determinants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zemin CaiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.
Wei HuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shukai ZhengDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.
Xilin WenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.
Kusheng WuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-2524

Funding

Kusheng Wu 2021ZDZX2023Kusheng Wu SFK2020-53-42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccination is the most effective method for the prevention of COVID-19. However, willingness to be vaccinated is not consistent. This study aimed to explore vaccine cognition, risk perception, and health behavior of COVID-19 in China. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in Guangdong province, China, including demographic characteristics, health status and preventive behaviors, cognition of COVID-19 vaccination, and the health belief model (HBM). Results: A total of 1640 participants were recruited. The main access to information about COVID-19 and vaccination as through official news and broadcasts (67.3%), social network software (58.7%), and professional popularization (46.2%). The precautions taken were wearing a mask (67.0%) and avoiding gathering together (71.3%). COVID-19 vaccination acceptability was different among different age groups and educational levels (p < 0.001). The major reasons for accepting vaccination included that it was an effective way to prevent COVID-19 (61.8%) and that it was required by working units/schools (51.1%). The fitting effect indexes of the (HBM) Model 2 showed better fitting than those of Model 1. In Model 2, perceived benefits (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.79−5.47), cues to action (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.60−3.11), and different occupations (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04−1.23) were positively correlated with vaccine acceptance; while perceived susceptibility (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30−0.74) and perceived barriers (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29−0.69) were negative factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: Different sociodemographic characteristics lead to differences in acceptance of vaccination, and the publicity and credibility of government play an indispensable role in epidemic control. The establishment of the HBM further predicted that perceived susceptibility to COVID-19, benefits of vaccination, barriers of cognition, and cue to action were the influencing factors of intention and health behaviors.

Indexed as

behaviorcognitionCOVID-19 vaccinationhealth belief model

Identifiers

PMID35455293
PMCPMC9030847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.