Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455285›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

The Pilot Study of Immunogenicity and Adverse Events of a COVID-19 Vaccine Regimen: Priming with Inactivated Whole SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (CoronaVac) and Boosting with the Adenoviral Vector (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Vaccine.

Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, Athiwat Khunphon, Oraya Kwangsukstid, Sompong Sapsutthipas, Mingkwan Wichaidit, Archawin Rojanawiwat, Nuanjun Wichuckchinda, Wiroj Puangtubtim, Warangluk Pimpapai, Sakulrat Soonthorncharttrawat and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sinopharm Vaccine, SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections and Hemoglobinopathies.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Surakameth MahasirimongkolMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Athiwat KhunphonMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Oraya KwangsukstidInstitute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Sompong SapsutthipasInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Mingkwan WichaiditInstitute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Archawin RojanawiwatNational Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Nuanjun WichuckchindaMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Wiroj PuangtubtimMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Warangluk PimpapaiMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Sakulrat SoonthorncharttrawatMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Asawin WanitchangVirology and Cell Technology Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Anan JongkaewwattanaVirology and Cell Technology Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-9883
Kanjana SrisutthisamphanEpidemiology Division, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Daraka PhainupongInstitute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Naphatcha ThawongMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Pundharika PiboonsiriMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Waritta SawaengdeeMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Thitiporn SomsaardInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Kanokphon RitthithamInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Supaporn ChumpolInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Nadthanan PinyosukheeMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Rattanawadee WichajarnMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Panadda DhepaksonMedical Life Sciences Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Sopon IamsirithawornEpidemiology Division, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Supaporn PhumiamornInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Ministry of Public Health · THNational Science and Technology Development Agency · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant, which partially escaped the vaccine-induced immunity provided by two doses of vaccination with CoronaVac (Sinovac), the National Vaccine Committee recommended the heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 (Oxford−AstraZeneca), a prime−boost vaccine regimen. This pilot study aimed to describe the immunogenicity and adverse events of the heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 regimen, in comparison with homologous CoronaVac, and homologous ChAdOx1. Between May and August 2021, we recruited a total of 354 participants from four vaccination groups: the CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 vaccinee (n = 155), the homologous CoronaVac vaccinee (n = 32), the homologous ChAdOx1 vaccinee (n = 47), and control group of COVID-19 patients (n = 120). Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring the level of IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-SRBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit and the level of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against variants of concern (VOCs) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT). The safety profile was recorded by interviewing at the 1-month visit after vaccination. The anti-SRBD level after the second booster dose of the CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 group at 2 weeks was higher than 4 weeks. At 4 weeks after the second booster dose, the anti-SRBD level in the CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 group was significantly higher than either homologous CoronaVac, the homologous ChAdOx1 group, and Control group (p < 0.001). In the CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 group, the PRNT50 level against the wild-type (434.5 BAU/mL) was the highest; followed by Alpha variant (80.4), Delta variant (67.4), and Beta variant (19.8). The PVNT50 level was also found to be at its highest against the wild-type (432.1); followed by Delta variants (178.3), Alpha variants (163.9), and Beta variant (42.2), respectively. The AEs in the CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 group were well tolerated and generally unremarkable. The CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 heterologous regimen induced higher immunogenicity and a tolerable safety profile. In a situation when only CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 vaccines are available, they should be considered for use in responding to the Delta variant.

Indexed as

adenoviral vectorCOVID-19 vaccineheterologousheterologous prime-boosthomologousimmunogenicityinactivated

Identifiers

PMID35455285
PMCPMC9028748
OpenAlexW4220674887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.