Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455249›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness and Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers: A Single-Center Experience.

Marija Zdravkovic, Viseslav Popadic, Vladimir Nikolic, Slobodan Klasnja, Milica Brajkovic, Andrea Manojlovic, Novica Nikolic, Ljiljana Markovic-Denic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marija ZdravkovicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Viseslav PopadicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-7481
Vladimir NikolicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0216-6392
Slobodan KlasnjaUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6040-0183
Milica BrajkovicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Andrea ManojlovicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Novica NikolicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Ljiljana Markovic-DenicUniversity Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-7540-9829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at higher risk of developing COVID-19 due to their professional exposition to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study assesses the intention of vaccination against COVID-19 before the vaccines were approved, and the rate of vaccine uptake during the first nine months of immunization among HCWs. A cross-sectional seroprevalence study was carried out during July 2020 in University Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa in Belgrade, Serbia that included 62.8% of all HCWs. Besides serological testing for IgG antibodies, data about HCWs' intention to accept COVID-19 vaccination if a vaccine became available were collected. This cohort of HCWs was followed up until the end of October 2021 to assess the number of vaccinated and PCR-positive staff. In the cross-sectional study, 18.3% HCWs had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies without difference with IgG-negative HCWs regarding age, gender, profession type, and years of service. Before vaccines became available, a significantly higher percentage of IgG-positive HCWs compared to IgG-negative HCWs was unsure whether to be vaccinated (62.5% vs. 49.0%), and significantly fewer stated that they would not be vaccinated (16.7% vs. 25.1%). When the vaccines became available in Serbia, among IgG-negative HCWs, those who stated clear positive (yes) and clear negative (no) attitude toward vaccination before the immunization period had begun were vaccinated at 28% and 20%, respectively, while 51% of unsure HCWs received a vaccine (

Indexed as

attitudesCOVID-19healthcare workersvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35455249
PMCPMC9024424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.