Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455237›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

The Side Effects and Adverse Clinical Cases Reported after COVID-19 Immunization.

Roshina Rabail, Waqar Ahmed, Madiha Ilyas, Muhammad Shahid Riaz Rajoka, Abdo Hassoun, Abdur Rauf Khalid, Moazzam Rafiq Khan, Rana Muhammad Aadil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roshina RabailNational Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1600-5191
Waqar AhmedNational Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Madiha IlyasDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Government College Women University, Madina Town, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahid Riaz RajokaFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-4584
Abdo HassounSustainable AgriFoodtech Innovation & Research (SAFIR), 62000 Arras, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-292X
Abdur Rauf KhalidDepartment of Livestock and Poultry Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Moazzam Rafiq KhanNational Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Rana Muhammad AadilNational Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0185-0096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 remains a deadly disease that poses a serious threat to humanity. COVID-19 vaccines protect the public and limit viral spread. However, public acceptance is significantly dependent on the efficacy and side effects (SEs) of the vaccinations being produced. Four important mechanisms have been examined for COVID-19 vaccines: DNA-based, mRNA-based, protein-based, and inactivated viruses. Vaccination safety research was formerly limited to manufacturer-sponsored studies, but numerous additional cross-sectional survey-based studies conducted globally have contributed to the generation of vaccine-related safety data reports. Twenty-seven studies and twenty-four case reports published-up till 2021 were overviewed for the presentation of SEs and their severity. Injection site pain remained the most dominant localized SE, while headache and fatigue were the most prevalent systemic SEs. Most studies reported that all vaccinations were safe, with very little or no adverse effects, but the nature of SEs was reported to be more persistent in DNA- and mRNA-based vaccines, while inactivated viral vaccines were associated with longer-duration SEs. Overall, SEs were found to be more dominant in women and youngsters. Case reports of adverse reactions have also been documented, but there is still a need to find out their pathological linkage with the COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

AstraZeneca side effectsCOVID-19 vaccination side effectsModerna side effectsPfizer side effectsSinopharm side effectsSputnik V side effects

Identifiers

PMID35455237
PMCPMC9031559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.