Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455209›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Method for Unsupervised Semi-Quantification of Inmunohistochemical Staining with Beta Divergences.

Auxiliadora Sarmiento, Iván Durán-Díaz, Irene Fondón, Mercedes Tomé, Clément Bodineau, Raúl V Durán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Auxiliadora SarmientoDepartamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Descubrimientos S/N, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2587-1382
Iván Durán-DíazDepartamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Descubrimientos S/N, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-1203
Irene FondónDepartamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Descubrimientos S/N, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-7109
Mercedes ToméCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa-CABIMER, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Avda. Américo Vespucio 24, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8682-1800
Clément BodineauCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa-CABIMER, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Avda. Américo Vespucio 24, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0532-8852
Raúl V DuránCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa-CABIMER, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Avda. Américo Vespucio 24, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-9215
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF),European Union PGC2018-096244-B-I00, SAF2016-75442-RFEDER/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Economía y Conocimiento US-1264994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many research laboratories, it is essential to determine the relative expression levels of some proteins of interest in tissue samples. The semi-quantitative scoring of a set of images consists of establishing a scale of scores ranging from zero or one to a maximum number set by the researcher and assigning a score to each image that should represent some predefined characteristic of the IHC staining, such as its intensity. However, manual scoring depends on the judgment of an observer and therefore exposes the assessment to a certain level of bias. In this work, we present a fully automatic and unsupervised method for comparative biomarker quantification in histopathological brightfield images. The method relies on a color separation method that discriminates between two chromogens expressed as brown and blue colors robustly, independent of color variation or biomarker expression level. For this purpose, we have adopted a two-stage stain separation approach in the optical density space. First, a preliminary separation is performed using a deconvolution method in which the color vectors of the stains are determined after an eigendecomposition of the data. Then, we adjust the separation using the non-negative matrix factorization method with beta divergences, initializing the algorithm with the matrices resulting from the previous step. After that, a feature vector of each image based on the intensity of the two chromogens is determined. Finally, the images are annotated using a systematically initialized k-means clustering algorithm with beta divergences. The method clearly defines the initial boundaries of the categories, although some flexibility is added. Experiments for the semi-quantitative scoring of images in five categories have been carried out by comparing the results with the scores of four expert researchers yielding accuracies that range between 76.60% and 94.58%. These results show that the proposed automatic scoring system, which is definable and reproducible, produces consistent results.

Indexed as

beta divergenceeigendecompositionhistopathological imagesnon-negative matrix factorizationsemi-quantitative scoringunsupervised stain separation

Identifiers

PMID35455209
PMCPMC9029173
OpenAlexW4224113610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.