Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455095›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prediction of Emergency Cesarean Section Using Machine Learning Methods: Development and External Validation of a Nationwide Multicenter Dataset in Republic of Korea.

Jeong Ha Wie, Se Jin Lee, Sae Kyung Choi, Yun Sung Jo, Han Sung Hwang, Mi Hye Park, Yeon Hee Kim, Jae Eun Shin, Ki Cheol Kil, Su Mi Kim and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong Ha WieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-5148
Se Jin LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon 24289, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-6250
Sae Kyung ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 21431, Korea.
Yun Sung JoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 16247, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-9338
Han Sung HwangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0622-0701
Mi Hye ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Medical Center, Ewha Medical Institute, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Korea.
Yeon Hee KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 11765, Korea.
Jae Eun ShinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 14647, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8326-8541
Ki Cheol KilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Korea.
Su Mi KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 34943, Korea.
Bong Suk ChoiInnerwave Co., Ltd., Seoul 08510, Korea.
Hanul HongInnerwave Co., Ltd., Seoul 08510, Korea.
Hyun-Joo SeolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 05278, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0303-7813
Hye-Sung WonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Hyun Sun KoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-6206
Sunghun NaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon 24289, Korea.
Kangwon National University Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KREwha Womans University Medical Center · KRKonkuk University · KRKyung Hee University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

Korean Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI21C1300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of term nulliparous women who underwent labor, and was conducted to develop an automated machine learning model for prediction of emergent cesarean section (CS) before onset of labor. Nine machine learning methods of logistic regression, random forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Voting, and Stacking were applied and compared for prediction of emergent CS during active labor. External validation was performed using a nationwide multicenter dataset for Korean fetal growth. A total of 6549 term nulliparous women was included in the analysis, and the emergent CS rate was 16.1%. The C-statistics values for KNN, Voting, XGBoost, Stacking, gradient boosting, random forest, LGBM, logistic regression, and SVM were 0.6, 0.69, 0.64, 0.59, 0.66, 0.68, 0.68, 0.7, and 0.69, respectively. The logistic regression model showed the best predictive performance with an accuracy of 0.78. The machine learning model identified nine significant variables of maternal age, height, weight at pre-pregnancy, pregnancy-associated hypertension, gestational age, and fetal sonographic findings. The C-statistic value for the logistic regression machine learning model in the external validation set (1391 term nulliparous women) was 0.69, with an overall accuracy of 0.68, a specificity of 0.83, and a sensitivity of 0.41. Machine learning algorithms with clinical and sonographic parameters at near term could be useful tools to predict individual risk of emergent CS during active labor in nulliparous women.

Indexed as

cesareanemergencylabormachine learningnulliparousprediction

Identifiers

PMID35455095
PMCPMC9033083
OpenAlexW4224279211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.