Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Chloé CatovicUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.
Imen AbbesUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.
Magalie BarreauUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.
Catherine SauvageAssociation Lin et Chanvre Bio, F-76450 Saint Vaast Dieppedalle, France.
Jacques FolletAssociation Lin et Chanvre Bio, F-76450 Saint Vaast Dieppedalle, France.
Cécile Duclairoir-PocUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.
Anne GroboillotUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.
Sandra LeblancBiogalenys SAS, F-27930 Miserey, France.
Pascal SvinareffBiogalenys SAS, F-27930 Miserey, France.
Sylvie ChevalierUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6489-438X
Marc G J FeuilloleyUnité de Recherche Communication Bactérienne et Stratégies Anti-Infectieuses (UR4312 CBSA), Université de Rouen-Normandie, F-27000 Evreux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6467-4336
Communication Bactérienne et Stratégie Anti-infectieuses
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Bacteria can bind on clothes, but the impacts of textiles leachables on cutaneous bacteria remain unknown. Here, we studied for the first time the effects of cotton and flax obtained through classical and soft ecological agriculture on the representatives
Indexed as
biofilmbiosurfactantscytotoxicitygrowthresistance to antibioticsskin bacteriaStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidissurface polaritytextiles leachables
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Cotton and Flax Textiles Leachables Impact Differently Cutaneous · full record | OpenQuestion