Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455024›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Cellular Immune Response in Patients Immunized with Three Vaccine Doses of Different Vaccination Schemes Authorized by the Chilean Ministry of Health in January 2022.

Paz Beatriz Tabilo Valenzuela, Gabriela Flores Balter, Gustavo Saint-Pierre Contreras, Daniel Conei Valencia, Catalina Moreno Calderón, Constanza Bohle Venegas, Marcia Guajardo Rivera, Francisco Silva Ojeda, Maria Jesus Vial Covarrubias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paz Beatriz Tabilo ValenzuelaServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9934-1304
Gabriela Flores BalterServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Gustavo Saint-Pierre ContrerasServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Daniel Conei ValenciaPrograma de Doctorado en Ciencias Morfológicas, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-0177
Catalina Moreno CalderónServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Constanza Bohle VenegasServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Marcia Guajardo RiveraServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Francisco Silva OjedaServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Maria Jesus Vial CovarrubiasServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile · CLUniversidad de La Frontera · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December 2019, a case of atypical pneumonia was reported in Wuhan, China. It was named COVID-19 and caused by SARS-CoV-2. In a few months, scientific groups around the world developed vaccines to reduce the disease's severity. The objective was to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune response post immunization with three different vaccination schedules administered in Chile until January 2022. Sixty volunteers were recruited with a three-dose schedule, who had no history of infection nor close contact with a positive patient. IgG against the spike antigenic domain was detected, and the neutralization capacity against two groups of variants, Original/Alpha and Beta/Gamma, was also measured. Finally, the cellular response with interferon release was measured through IGRA. Results showed that there were significant differences in the neutralizing antibodies for the original and alpha variant when comparing three Comirnaty doses with Coronavac and Vaxzevria. A high number of reactive subjects against the different SARS-CoV-2 variants, alpha, gamma, and delta, were observed, with no significant differences between any of the three schemes, confirming the existence of a cellular immune response against SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, the three vaccine schemes generated a cellular immune response in these volunteers.

Indexed as

cell-mediated immunityCOVID-19 vaccinesinterferon-gamma release assaysSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35455024
PMCPMC9030012
OpenAlexW4224308222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.