Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454983›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Skull Base Approaches for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: Institutional Experience in a Series of 34 Patients.

Shamsul Alam, Gianluca Ferini, Nur Muhammad, Nazmin Ahmed, Abu Naim Mohammad Wakil, Kazi Mohammad Atiqul Islam, Mohammad Samsul Arifin, Abdullah Al Mahbub, Riad Habib, Mosiur Rahman Mojumder and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optochiasmatic cavernoma: Surgical treatment and outcomes.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shamsul AlamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Gianluca FeriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia SRL, Viagrande, 95029 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-5544
Nur MuhammadDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital, Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Nazmin AhmedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute (A Centre for Cardiovascular, Neuroscience and Organ Transplant Units), Shahbag, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Abu Naim Mohammad WakilDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Kazi Mohammad Atiqul IslamDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital, Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Samsul ArifinDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital, Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al MahbubDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital, Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Riad HabibDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Mosiur Rahman MojumderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comilla Medical College Hospital, Comilla 3500, Bangladesh.
Atul VatsDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bhawani Hospital and Research Centre, Birgunj 44300, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate our institutional outcome in tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) patients treated microsurgically using multiple skull base approaches, including a transcranial approach and an extended endonasal transsphenoidal approach. (2) Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study that includes 34 patients with TSM. The study aimed to observe the efficacy of the different common approaches used by a single neurosurgeon. All the patients were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-up with campimetry, head CT scan, and post-contrast MRI. (3) Results: After a transcranial approach, visual acuity improved in 86.20%, was stable in 10.34%, and deteriorated in 3.45%. Through transsphenoidal surgery, vision improved in 80%, was static in 20%, and deteriorated in 0%. Transcranial approaches included pterional, mini-bifrontal basal, and supraciliary keyhole microscopic craniotomies. Gross total removal was performed in 58.82%, near total in 10.34%, and partial removal in 3.45%. The transcranial/supraciliary keyhole endoscopic-assisted approach showed a gross total removal rate of 80%, and near total in 20%. The transsphenoidal approach showed a gross total removal rate of 60%, near total in 20%, and partial removal in 20%. (4) Conclusion: Endoscopic-assisted keyhole supraciliary mini craniotomy for resection of tuberculum sellae meningioma offers low morbidity and good visual outcome. The endonasal route is preferred for the removal of TSM when they are small and midline placed. The major limitation of this approach is a narrow surgical corridor and the restriction on midline-placed lesions. Gross total removal was better achieved with mini-bifrontal basal and pterional craniotomies.

Indexed as

bifrontal craniotomyendoscopymeningiomamicrosurgerypterional craniotomyskull basesupraciliary keyholetranssphenoidaltuberculum sellae

Identifiers

PMID35454983
PMCPMC9030651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.