Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454949›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Breast Tumor Identification in Ultrafast MRI Using Temporal and Spatial Information.

Xueping Jing, Monique D Dorrius, Mirjam Wielema, Paul E Sijens, Matthijs Oudkerk, Peter van Ooijen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Abbreviated and Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xueping JingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7424-5057
Monique D DorriusDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mirjam WielemaDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9275-0364
Paul E SijensDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matthijs OudkerkFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter van OoijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-1210
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the feasibility of using deep learning methods to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions in ultrafast MRI with both temporal and spatial information.

methodsA total of 173 single breasts of 122 women (151 examinations) with lesions above 5 mm were retrospectively included. A total of 109 out of 173 lesions were benign. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were generated from each of the 14 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted acquisitions in the ultrafast MRI scan. A 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network were employed to extract morphological and temporal features, respectively. The 2D CNN model was trained with the MIPs from the last four acquisitions to ensure the visibility of the lesions, while the LSTM model took MIPs of an entire scan as input. The performance of each model and their combination were evaluated with 100-times repeated stratified four-fold cross-validation. Those models were then compared with models developed with standard DCE-MRI which followed the same data split.

resultsIn the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions, the ultrafast MRI-based 2D CNN achieved a mean AUC of 0.81 ± 0.06, and the LSTM network achieved a mean AUC of 0.78 ± 0.07; their combination showed a mean AUC of 0.83 ± 0.06 in the cross-validation. The mean AUC values were significantly higher for ultrafast MRI-based models than standard DCE-MRI-based models.

conclusionDeep learning models developed with ultrafast breast MRI achieved higher performances than standard DCE-MRI for malignancy discrimination. The improved AUC values of the combined models indicate an added value of temporal information extracted by the LSTM model in breast lesion characterization.

Indexed as

deep learninglesion classificationultrafast breast MRI

Identifiers

PMID35454949
PMCPMC9027362
OpenAlexW4225907542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.