Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454915›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

A Consistent Protocol Reveals a Large Heterogeneity in the Biological Effectiveness of Proton and Carbon-Ion Beams for Various Sarcoma and Normal-Tissue-Derived Cell Lines.

Masashi Yagi, Yutaka Takahashi, Kazumasa Minami, Taeko Matsuura, Jin-Min Nam, Yasuhito Onodera, Takashi Akagi, Takuya Maeda, Tomoaki Okimoto, Hiroki Shirato and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masashi YagiDepartment of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City 566-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2827-5407
Yutaka TakahashiDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamada-oka, Suita City 566-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Kazumasa MinamiDepartment of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City 566-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3864-6478
Taeko MatsuuraFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North-13 West-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Hokkaido, Japan.
Jin-Min NamGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasuhito OnoderaGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takashi AkagiDepartment of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, 1-2-1 Kouto Shingu-cho, Tatsuno City 679-5165, Hyogo, Japan.
Takuya MaedaDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, 1-2-1 Kouto Shingu-cho, Tatsuno City 679-5165, Hyogo, Japan.
Tomoaki OkimotoDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, 1-2-1 Kouto Shingu-cho, Tatsuno City 679-5165, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroki ShiratoGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuhiko OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City 566-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPHyogo Ion Beam Medical Center · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 17he1002003h0002Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17K16437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated variations in the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values among various sarcoma and normal-tissue-derived cell lines (normal cell line) in proton beam and carbon-ion irradiations. We used a consistent protocol that specified the timing of irradiation after plating cells and detailed the colony formation assay. We examined the cell type dependence of RBE for proton beam and carbon-ion irradiations using four human sarcoma cell lines (MG63 osteosarcoma, HT1080 fibrosarcoma, SW872 liposarcoma, and SW1353 chondrosarcoma) and three normal cell lines (HDF human dermal fibroblast, hTERT-HME1 mammary gland, and NuLi-1 bronchus epithelium). The cells were irradiated with gamma rays, proton beams at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak, or carbon-ion beams at 54.4 keV/μm linear energy transfer. In all sarcoma and normal cell lines, the average RBE values in proton beam and carbon-ion irradiations were 1.08 ± 0.11 and 2.08 ± 0.36, which were consistent with the values of 1.1 and 2.13 used in current treatment planning systems, respectively. Up to 34% difference in the RBE of the proton beam was observed between MG63 and HT1080. Similarly, a 32% difference in the RBE of the carbon-ion beam was observed between SW872 and the other sarcoma cell lines. In proton beam irradiation, normal cell lines had less variation in RBE values (within 10%), whereas in carbon-ion irradiation, RBE values differed by up to 48% between hTERT-HME1 and NuLi-1. Our results suggest that specific dose evaluations for tumor and normal tissues are necessary for treatment planning in both proton and carbon-ion therapies.

Indexed as

carbon ionsparticle therapyprotonradiobiologyradiotherapyRBE

Identifiers

PMID35454915
PMCPMC9029457
OpenAlexW4224104876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.