Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454901›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data.

Shea P O'Connell, Maria Frantzi, Agnieszka Latosinska, Martyn Webb, William Mullen, Martin Pejchinovski, Mark Salji, Harald Mischak, Colin S Cooper, Jeremy Clark and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shea P O'ConnellNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2850-3908
Maria FrantziDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-0316
Agnieszka LatosinskaDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.
Martyn WebbNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
William MullenInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-1563
Martin PejchinovskiDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8029-5800
Mark SaljiInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
Harald MischakDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-0306
Colin S CooperNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Jeremy ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Daniel S BrewerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-9794
On Behalf Of The Movember Gap Urine Biomarker Consortium

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research E! 11023, EurostarsMovember Foundation GAP-1 Urine Biomarkers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a clinical need to improve assessment of biopsy-naïve patients for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we investigated whether the robust integration of expression data from urinary extracellular vesicle RNA (EV-RNA) with urine proteomic metabolites can accurately predict PCa biopsy outcome. Urine samples collected within the Movember GAP1 Urine Biomarker study (n = 192) were analysed by both mass spectrometry-based urine-proteomics and NanoString gene-expression analysis (167 gene-probes). Cross-validated LASSO penalised regression and Random Forests identified a combination of clinical and urinary biomarkers for predictive modelling of significant disease (Gleason Score (Gs) ≥ 3 + 4). Four predictive models were developed: ‘MassSpec’ (CE-MS proteomics), ‘EV-RNA’, and ‘SoC’ (standard of care) clinical data models, alongside a fully integrated omics-model, deemed ‘ExoSpec’. ExoSpec (incorporating four gene transcripts, six peptides, and two clinical variables) is the best model for predicting Gs ≥ 3 + 4 at initial biopsy (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77−0.88) and is superior to a standard of care (SoC) model utilising clinical data alone (AUC = 0.71, p < 0.001, 1000 resamples). As the ExoSpec Risk Score increases, the likelihood of higher-grade PCa on biopsy is significantly greater (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1−3.7). The decision curve analyses reveals that ExoSpec provides a net benefit over SoC and could reduce unnecessary biopsies by 30%.

Indexed as

extracellular vesiclesmass spectrometryprostate cancerRNAurinary biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35454901
PMCPMC9027643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.