Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454792›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: The Obstacles We Face in Determining a Non-Invasive Test and Current Advances in Biomarker Detection.

Faddy Kamel, Khadiga Eltarhoni, Pasha Nisar, Mikhail Soloviev

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Predictive role of [EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Insight into the Role of the miR-584 Family in Human Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faddy KamelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Khadiga EltarhoniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8515-2251
Pasha NisarAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey KT16 0RQ, UK.
Mikhail SolovievDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-1134
Royal Holloway University of London · GBAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, with 1.4 million new cases and over 700,000 deaths per annum. Despite being one of the most common cancers, few molecular approaches to detect CRC exist. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a known serum biomarker that is used in CRC for monitoring disease recurrence or response to treatment. However, it can also be raised in multiple benign conditions, thus having no value in early detection or screening for CRC. Molecular biomarkers play an ever-increasing role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and outcome prediction of disease, however, only a limited number of biomarkers are available and none are suitable for early detection and screening of CRC. A PCR-based Epi proColon

Indexed as

biomarkerscancer detectioncancer screeningcancer treatmentcolorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID35454792
PMCPMC9029324
OpenAlexW4224251424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.