Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454768›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Measurement of Perfusion Heterogeneity within Tumor Habitats on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Association with Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients.

Hwan-Ho Cho, Haejung Kim, Sang Yu Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Boo-Kyung Han, Eun Young Ko, Ji Soo Choi, Hyunjin Park, Eun Sook Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MRI-based perfusion-diffusion habitat analysis for characterizing intratumoral heterogeneity in rectal adenocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hwan-Ho ChoDepartment of Medical Artificial Intelligence, Konyang University, Daejon 32992, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-6891
Haejung KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Sang Yu NamDepartment of Radiology, Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon 21565, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-7206
Jeong Eon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Boo-Kyung HanDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Eun Young KoDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Ji Soo ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Hyunjin ParkCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-8918
Eun Sook KoDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-7956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify perfusional subregions sharing similar kinetic characteristics from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using data-driven clustering, and to evaluate the effect of perfusional heterogeneity based on those subregions on patients' survival outcomes in various risk models. From two hospitals, 308 and 147 women with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI between October 2011 and July 2012 were retrospectively enrolled as development and validation cohorts, respectively. Using the Cox-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model, a habitat risk score (HRS) was constructed from the radiomics features from the derived habitat map. An HRS-only, clinical, combined habitat, and two conventional radiomics risk models to predict patients' disease-free survival (DFS) were built. Patients were classified into low-risk or high-risk groups using the median cutoff values of each risk score. Five habitats with distinct perfusion patterns were identified. An HRS was an independent risk factor for predicting worse DFS outcomes in the HRS-only risk model (hazard ratio = 3.274 [95% CI = 1.378-7.782];

Indexed as

breast cancerheterogeneitykineticsmagnetic resonance imagingperfusionprognosisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35454768
PMCPMC9025287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.