Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454766›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Cutting-Edge Platforms for Analysis of Immune Cells in the Hepatic Microenvironment-Focus on Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Daniel E Millian, Omar A Saldarriaga, Timothy Wanninger, Jared K Burks, Yousef N Rafati, Joseph Gosnell, Heather L Stevenson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Digital pathology for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis assessment.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel E MillianDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9661-7165
Omar A SaldarriagaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Timothy WanningerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Jared K BurksDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-9074
Yousef N RafatiSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Joseph GosnellDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Heather L StevensonDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-7621
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Hepatocellular CarcinomaP50CA217674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI YAO, JAMES C · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
SURGICAL TRAINING IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOCRINOLOGYT32DK007639 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI RADHAKRISHNAN, RAVI S. · 1992 to 2022
$3.6M
ANALYSIS OF INTRAHEPATIC MACROPHAGE PROFILES FOR PREDICTING RISK OF FIBROSIS DEVELOPMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF CHRONIC LIVER DISEASER01DK125730 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI STEVENSON, HEATHER L · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
Single Cell Spatial Analysis in TissueR50CA243707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BURKS, JARED KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217674NCI NIH HHS R50 CA243707NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125730NIDDK NIH HHS T325R32DK007639-28; 1RO1DK125730-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poorly understood. Most studies rely on platforms that remove intrahepatic macrophages from the microenvironment prior to evaluation. Cell isolation causes activation and phenotypic changes that may not represent their actual biology and function in situ. State-of-the-art methods provides new strategies to study TAMs without losing the context of tissue architecture and spatial relationship with neighboring cells. These technologies, such as multispectral imaging (e.g., Vectra Polaris), mass cytometry by time-of-flight (e.g., Fluidigm CyTOF), cycling of fluorochromes (e.g., Akoya Biosciences CODEX/PhenoCycler-Fusion, Bruker Canopy, Lunaphore Comet, and CyCIF) and digital spatial profiling or transcriptomics (e.g., GeoMx or Visium, Vizgen Merscope) are being utilized to accurately assess the complex cellular network within the tissue microenvironment. In cancer research, these platforms enable characterization of immune cell phenotypes and expression of potential therapeutic targets, such as PDL-1 and CTLA-4. Newer spatial profiling platforms allow for detection of numerous protein targets, in combination with whole transcriptome analysis, in a single liver biopsy tissue section. Macrophages can also be specifically targeted and analyzed, enabling quantification of both protein and gene expression within specific cell phenotypes, including TAMs. This review describes the workflow of each platform, summarizes recent research using these approaches, and explains the advantages and limitations of each.

Indexed as

cancerCyTOFHCChepatic microenvironmentlivermacrophagesscRNA-seqspatial genomicsspectral imagingTAMsTME

Identifiers

PMID35454766
PMCPMC9026790
OpenAlexW4224298605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.