Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454746›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Four Plant Essential Oils against Some Food and Phytopathogens Isolated from Processed Meat Products in Egypt.

Shahenda S Elshafie, Hazem S Elshafie, Rasha M El Bayomi, Ippolito Camele, Alaa Eldin M A Morshdy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahenda S ElshafieFood Control Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
Hazem S ElshafieSchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-7319
Rasha M El BayomiFood Control Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-9801
Ippolito CameleSchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-8234
Alaa Eldin M A MorshdyFood Control Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic preservatives are widely utilized by the food industry to inhibit the microbial contamination and increase food safety and shelf life. The excessive utilization of synthetic preservatives can have a negative impact on human health and the environment. There is a great interest to find out natural substances as possible food-preservatives. The consumers' preference for food products with natural ingredients prompted food manufacturers to utilize natural-based preservatives in their production. It is worth noting that plant essential oils (EOs) among the natural-based substances have been efficiently used as antimicrobial agents against phyto- and food pathogens. The current study was conducted to evaluate the microbial contamination of three industrial meat products from five governorates in Egypt, identify the predominant bacterial and fungal isolates and determine the antimicrobial efficacy of some EOs (thyme, fennel, anise and marjoram) against the most predominant microbial isolates. A sensory test was also performed to estimate the customer preferences for specific organoleptic aspects of meat products after EOs treatment. Results showed that there is a promising antimicrobial activity of all studied EOs against some microbial isolates in a dose-dependent manner. In particular, thyme EO showed the highest significant antibacterial activity against

Indexed as

aromatic plantsfood contaminationfood preservationmolecular identificationnatural productssensory test

Identifiers

PMID35454746
PMCPMC9032107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.