Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454664›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Concept of Postbiotics.

Gabriel Vinderola, Mary Ellen Sanders, Seppo Salminen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07278024 (To Investigate the Effect of Postbiotic Intervention on Vaginal Microbiota in Infertile Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 181 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07278024 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

To Investigate the Effect of Postbiotic Intervention on Vaginal Microbiota in Infertile Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsInfertile Women Undergoing IVF or ICSIArmspostbiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of the Safety and Impact of Heat-TreatedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Effects of Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Beyond Probiotics: Postbiotics for Healthy Aquaculture.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Development of Pharmabiotic Gel-Serums withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A Postbiotic ContainingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects ofBiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel VinderolaInstituto de Lactología Industrial (INLAIN, UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe 3000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-8528
Mary Ellen SandersInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO 80122, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-3423
Seppo SalminenFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-7642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific community has proposed terms such as non-viable probiotics, paraprobiotics, ghostbiotics, heat-inactivated probiotics or, most commonly, postbiotics, to refer to inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits. This article addresses the various characteristics of different definitions of 'postbiotics' that have emerged over past years. In 2021, the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) defined a postbiotic as "a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host". This definition of postbiotic requires that the whole or components of inactivated microbes be present, with or without metabolic end products. The definition proposed by ISAPP is comprehensive enough to allow the development of postbiotics from different microorganisms, to be applied in different body sites, encouraging innovation in a promising area for any regulatory category and for companion or production animals, and plant or human health. From a technological perspective, probiotic products may contain inanimate microorganisms, which have the potential to impart a health benefit. However, their contribution to health in most cases has not been established, even if at least one probiotic has been shown to confer the same health benefit by live or inanimate cells.

Indexed as

heat-inactivated probioticsinanimateInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and PrebioticsISAPPmicroorganismsnon-viable probioticspostbioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35454664
PMCPMC9027423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.