Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454598›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Hydroxyapatite Use in Spine Surgery-Molecular and Clinical Aspect.

Jakub Litak, Wojciech Czyzewski, Michał Szymoniuk, Bartlomiej Pastuszak, Joanna Litak, Grzegorz Litak, Cezary Grochowski, Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah, Piotr Kamieniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jakub LitakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-9263
Wojciech CzyzewskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Michał SzymoniukDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Bartlomiej PastuszakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Joanna LitakCentrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Grzegorz LitakDepartment of Automation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-8345
Cezary GrochowskiLaboratory of Virtual Man, Medical University of Lublin, 20-439 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-885X
Mansur Rahnama-HezavahDepartment of Dental Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-7330
Piotr KamieniakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLLublin University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite possesses desirable properties as a scaffold in tissue engineering: it is biocompatible at a site of implantation, and it is degradable to non-toxic products. Moreover, its porosity enables infiltration of cells, nutrients and waste products. The outcome of hydroxyapatite implantation highly depends on the extent of the host immune response. Authors emphasise major roles of the chemical, morphological and physical properties of the surface of biomaterial used. A number of techniques have been applied to transform the theoretical osteoconductive features of HAp into spinal fusion systems-from integration of HAp with autograft to synthetic intervertebral implants. The most popular uses of HAp in spine surgery include implants (ACDF), bone grafts in posterolateral lumbar fusion and transpedicular screws coating. In the past, autologous bone graft has been used as an intervertebral cage in ACDF. Due to the morbidity related to autograft harvesting from the iliac bone, a synthetic cage with osteoconductive material such as hydroxyapatite seems to be a good alternative. Regarding posterolateral lumbar fusion, it requires the graft to induce new bone growth and reinforce fusion between the vertebrae. Hydroxyapatite formulations have shown good results in that field. Moreover, the HAp coating has proven to be an efficient method of increasing screw fixation strength. It can decrease the risk of complications such as screw loosening after pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients. The purpose of this literature review is to describe in vivo reaction to HAp implants and to summarise its current application in spine surgery.

Indexed as

HAphydroxyapatitespinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID35454598
PMCPMC9030649
OpenAlexW4223934975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.