ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Punching Shear Capacity of Lightweight Concrete Slabs.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessment of compressive strength of eco-concrete reinforced using machine learning tools.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning base models to predict the punching shear capacity of posttensioned UHPC flat slabs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning intelligence to assess the shear capacity of corroded reinforced concrete beams.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Machine Learning Model for Torsion Strength of Externally Bonded FRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams.Polymers · 2022Article
- Punching Shear Strength of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Slabs without Shear Reinforcements: A Reliability Assessment.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although lightweight concrete is implemented in many mega projects to reduce the cost and improve the project's economic aspect, research studies focus on investigating conventional normal-weight concrete. In addition, the punching shear failure of concrete slabs is dangerous and calls for precise and consistent prediction models. Thus, this current study investigates the prediction of the punching shear strength of lightweight concrete slabs. First, an extensive experimental database for lightweight concrete slabs tested under punching shear loading is gathered. Then, effective parameters are determined by applying the principles of statistical methods, namely, concrete density, columns dimensions, slab effective depth, concrete strength, flexure reinforcement ratio, and steel yield stress. Next, the manuscript presented three artificial intelligence models, which are genetic programming (GP), artificial neural network (ANN) and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR). In addition, it provided guidance for future design code development, where the importance of each variable on the strength was identified. Moreover, it provided an expression showing the complicated inter-relation between affective variables. The novelty lies in developing three proposed models for the punching capacity of lightweight concrete slabs using three different (AI) techniques capable of accurately predicting the strength compared to the experimental database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.