Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454241›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Lung Ultrasonography and Clinical Follow-Up Evaluations in Fattening Bulls Affected by Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) during the Restocking Period and after Tulathromycin and Ketoprofen Treatment.

Enrico Fiore, Anastasia Lisuzzo, Andrea Beltrame, Barbara Contiero, Matteo Gianesella, Eliana Schiavon, Rossella Tessari, Massimo Morgante, Elisa Mazzotta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrico FioreDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-9553
Anastasia LisuzzoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-0749
Andrea BeltrameIndependent Researcher, 1016 Isola Rizza, Italy.
Barbara ContieroDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6586-5035
Matteo GianesellaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Eliana SchiavonIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Rossella TessariDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Massimo MorganteDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Elisa MazzottaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-8467
University of Padua · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a global infectious disease, causing decreased well-being and economic losses in livestock, frequently during the restocking period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) to assess BRD in restocked animals, and the effectiveness of tulathromycin and ketoprofen treatment in sick animals. A total of 60 Limousin fattening bulls were enrolled. On the day of restocking (T0), the animals were divided into two groups based on TUS assessment of six lung areas: group C (ultrasonography score (US score) < 3) and group D (US score ≥ 3). Group D received a single administration of tulathromycin and ketoprofen at T0: this group was revaluated after 1.5, 3, 7, and 14 days. Both groups were revaluated after 21 days. The two groups showed a significant difference both in US score and clinical symptoms (respiratory score, nasal and ocular discharges, and rectal temperature) at T0. In group D, the treatment was effective in improving the clinical symptoms and US score, particularly reducing the severity of lung lesions. TUS represents a non-invasive and cost-effective tool for BRD early diagnosis and for monitoring treatment efficacy in restocked livestock.

Indexed as

bovine respiratory diseaseclinical follow-uppulmonary lesionsTUS

Identifiers

PMID35454241
PMCPMC9032330
OpenAlexW4223498663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.