Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454217›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Feed Restriction Improves Lipid Metabolism by Changing the Structure of the Cecal Microbial Community and Enhances the Meat Quality and Flavor of Bearded Chickens.

Jinling Ye, Shouqun Jiang, Zhonggang Cheng, Fayuan Ding, Qiuli Fan, Xiajing Lin, Yibing Wang, Zhongyong Gou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. LateiScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Beneficial Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinling YeInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Shouqun JiangInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Zhonggang ChengInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Fayuan DingInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Qiuli FanInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-1471
Xiajing LinInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Yibing WangInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2699-6304
Zhongyong GouInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-41Key Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province 2020B0202090004National Key R&D Project 2021YFD1300404National Natural Science Foundation of China 31802104Natural Science Foundation from Guangdong Province 2021A1515010830Natural Science Foundation from Guangdong Province 2021A1515012412the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences 202106TDthe Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences R2019PY-QF008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive fat deposition in full-fed Bearded chickens does not only reduce carcass yield but also causes consumer rejection of meat. Feed restriction (FR) is an effective method to save on feed cost, reduce carcass fat deposition, and improve meat quality. A total of 560 150-d Bearded chickens were randomly divided into seven groups (each with eight replicates of ten birds) for 40 days. The control group was fed with the basal diet ad libitum (CON), and the other six groups were fed with 90% of the feed intake (90% FI), 80% FI, 70% FI, 90% metabolizable energy (90% ME), 80% ME, and 70% ME of the CON, respectively. Compared to the CON group, FR increased meat yield, but the total weight of the Bearded chickens was slighter; 80% FI and 70% ME improved the relative lipid metabolism indices of chickens, especially the levels of triglycerides and total cholesterol in the plasma and liver (p < 0.05), and decreased calpastatin activity in the breast muscle (p < 0.05). Additionally, 16S rRNA sequencing of cecal microbial community indicated that an increase in the abundance of Hydrogenoanaerobacterium and Bacteroides plebeius was observed in the 80% FI group (p < 0.05), and an enrichment in Olsenella, Catabacter, and Lachnospiraceae were observed in the 70% ME group (p < 0.05) compared to the CON group. Moreover, compared to the CON group, the L * value of the breast muscle significantly decreased, and a * value significantly increased in the 80% FI group (p < 0.05). Notably, the concentrations of threonine, lysine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, proline, and arginine and the activity of calpain in breast muscle increased in the 80% FI group more than in the CON group (p < 0.05), while valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, lysine, alanine, tyrosine and proline decreased in ME restriction groups (p < 0.05). Taken together, our results indicated that 80% FI could improve lipid metabolism by changing the structure of the cecal microbial community, and the meat quality and flavor of the Bearded chickens in 80% FI group was improved with a promoted meat color score, flavor substances, and the calproteinase system.

Indexed as

Bearded chickenscecal microbial communityfeed restrictionflavormeat quality

Identifiers

PMID35454217
PMCPMC9029254
OpenAlexW4224236914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.