Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454056›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Multicentric Evaluation of SeeGene Allplex Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting 28 Bacterial, Microsporidal and Parasitic Nucleic Acid Sequences in Human Stool Samples.

Felix Weinreich, Andreas Hahn, Kirsten Alexandra Eberhardt, Simone Kann, Thomas Köller, Philipp Warnke, Susann Dupke, Denise Dekker, Jürgen May, Hagen Frickmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel comparative evaluation of multiplex PCR panels for gastrointestinal pathogen detection: Seegene Allplex™ vs. Luminex NxTAGEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Performance of the LiquidArrayDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Felix WeinreichDepartment of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-7072
Andreas HahnInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-8369
Kirsten Alexandra EberhardtDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg & I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20359 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-0326
Simone KannMedical Mission Institute, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas KöllerInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Philipp WarnkeInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Susann DupkeCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens/Highly Pathogenic Microorganisms, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Denise DekkerInfectious Disease Epidemiology Department, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, 20259 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-3217
Jürgen MayInfectious Disease Epidemiology Department, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, 20259 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7831-8420
Hagen FrickmannDepartment of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-9528
Ulrike LoderstädtDepartment of Hospital Hygiene & Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Defence 36K2-S-45 1922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior to the implementation of new diagnostic techniques, a thorough evaluation is mandatory in order to ensure diagnostic reliability. If positive samples are scarcely available, however, such evaluations can be difficult to perform. Here, we evaluated four SeeGene Allplex real-time PCR assays amplifying a total of 28 bacteria, microsporidal and parasitic nucleic acid sequence targets in human stool samples in a multicentric approach. In the assessments with strongly positive samples, sensitivity values ranging between 13% and 100% were recorded for bacteria, between 0% and 100% for protozoa and between 7% and 100% for helminths and microsporidia; for the weakly positive samples, the recorded sensitivity values for bacteria ranged from 0% to 100%; for protozoa, from 0% to 40%; and for helminths and microsporidia, from 0% to 53%. For bacteria, the recorded specificity was in the range between 87% and 100%, while a specificity of 100% was recorded for all assessed PCRs targeting parasites and microsporidia. The intra- and inter-assay variations were generally low. Specifically for some helminth species, the sensitivity could be drastically increased by applying manual nucleic acid extraction instead of the manufacturer-recommended automatic procedure, while such effects were less obvious for the bacteria and protozoa. In summary, the testing with the chosen positive control samples showed varying degrees of discordance between the evaluated Allplex assays and the applied in-house reference assays associated with higher cycle threshold values in the Allplex assays, suggesting that samples with very low pathogen densities might be missed. As the targeted species can occur as harmless colonizers in the gut of individuals in high-endemicity settings as well, future studies should aim at assessing the clinical relevance of the latter hint.

Indexed as

Allplexbacteriadiagnosisenteric pathogengastrointestinal infectionparasitereal-time PCRSeeGenetest comparisontest evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35454056
PMCPMC9032746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.