Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35454026›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Cell-Free DNA Fragmentomics in Liquid Biopsy.

Spencer C Ding, Y M Dennis Lo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adapting Clinical Chemistry Plasma as a Source for Liquid Biopsies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Spencer C DingCentre for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-5995
Y M Dennis LoCentre for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Innovation and Technology Fund under the InnoHK Initiative NALi Ka Shing Foundation NAThe Chinese University of Hong Kong VCF2014021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in bodily fluids has rapidly transformed the development of noninvasive prenatal testing, cancer liquid biopsy, and transplantation monitoring. Plasma cfDNA consists of a mixture of molecules originating from various bodily tissues. The study of the fragmentation patterns of cfDNA, also referred to as 'fragmentomics', is now an actively pursued area of biomarker research. Clues that cfDNA fragmentation patterns might carry information concerning the tissue of origin of cfDNA molecules have come from works demonstrating that circulating fetal, tumor-derived, and transplanted liver-derived cfDNA molecules have a shorter size distribution than the background mainly of hematopoietic origin. More recently, an improved understanding of cfDNA fragmentation has provided many emerging fragmentomic markers, including fragment sizes, preferred ends, end motifs, single-stranded jagged ends, and nucleosomal footprints. The intrinsic biological link between activities of various DNA nucleases and characteristic fragmentations has been demonstrated. In this review, we focus on the biological properties of cell-free DNA unveiled recently and their potential clinical applications.

Indexed as

cancer detectioncell-free DNAfragmentomicsliquid biopsyNIPT

Identifiers

PMID35454026
PMCPMC9027801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.