ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
De-Speckling Breast Cancer Ultrasound Images Using a Rotationally Invariant Block Matching Based Non-Local Means (RIBM-NLM) Method.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathological Insights: Enhanced Vision Transformers for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- F-Net: Follicles Net an efficient tool for the diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome using deep learning techniques.PloS one · 2024Article
- Graph neural network-based breast cancer diagnosis using ultrasound images with optimized graph construction integrating the medically significant features.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Vision-Transformer-Based Transfer Learning for Mammogram Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- BUViTNet: Breast Ultrasound Detection via Vision Transformers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers for Breast Cancer Chemotherapy.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ultrasonic technique is an indispensable imaging modality for diagnosis of breast cancer in young women due to its ability in efficiently capturing the tissue properties, and decreasing nega-tive recognition rate thereby avoiding non-essential biopsies. Despite the advantages, ultrasound images are affected by speckle noise, generating fine-false structures that decrease the contrast of the images and diminish the actual boundaries of tissues on ultrasound image. Moreover, speckle noise negatively impacts the subsequent stages in image processing pipeline, such as edge detec-tion, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. Previous studies have formulated vari-ous speckle reduction methods in ultrasound images; however, these methods suffer from being unable to retain finer edge details and require more processing time. In this study, we propose a breast ultrasound de-speckling method based on rotational invariant block matching non-local means (RIBM-NLM) filtering. The effectiveness of our method has been demonstrated by com-paring our results with three established de-speckling techniques, the switching bilateral filter (SBF), the non-local means filter (NLMF), and the optimized non-local means filter (ONLMF) on 250 images from public dataset and 6 images from private dataset. Evaluation metrics, including Self-Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), and Mean Square Error (MSE) were utilized to measure performance. With the proposed method, we were able to record average SSIM of 0.8915, PSNR of 65.97, MSE of 0.014, RMSE of 0.119, and computational speed of 82 seconds at noise variance of 20dB using the public dataset, all with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.