Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453875›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence.

Pengqiang Zhong, Mengzhi Hong, Huanyu He, Jiang Zhang, Yaoming Chen, Zhigang Wang, Peisong Chen, Juan Ouyang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pengqiang ZhongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Mengzhi HongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Huanyu HeDeepcyto LLC, 2304 Falcon Drive, West Linn, OR 97068, USA.
Jiang ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yaoming ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhigang WangDeepcyto LLC, 2304 Falcon Drive, West Linn, OR 97068, USA.
Peisong ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Juan OuyangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Juan Ouyang First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Horizontal Project Foundation 2019028Juan Ouyang Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019A1515011663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model that evaluates the feasibility of AI-assisted multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) diagnosis of acute leukemia. Two hundred acute leukemia patients and 94 patients with cytopenia(s) or hematocytosis were selected to study the AI application in MFC diagnosis of acute leukemia. The kappa test analyzed the consistency of the diagnostic results and the immunophenotype of acute leukemia. Bland-Altman and Pearson analyses evaluated the consistency and correlation of the abnormal cell proportion between the AI and manual methods. The AI analysis time for each case (83.72 ± 23.90 s, mean ± SD) was significantly shorter than the average time for manual analysis (15.64 ± 7.16 min, mean ± SD). The total consistency of diagnostic results was 0.976 (kappa (κ) = 0.963). The Bland-Altman evaluation of the abnormal cell proportion between the AI analysis and manual analysis showed that the bias ± SD was 0.752 ± 6.646, and the 95% limit of agreement was from -12.775 to 13.779 (

Indexed as

acute leukemiaartificial intelligencemultiparameter flow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID35453875
PMCPMC9029950
OpenAlexW4221051501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.