Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453842›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Embedded System Using Convolutional Neural Network Model for Online and Real-Time ECG Signal Classification and Prediction.

Wahyu Caesarendra, Taufiq Aiman Hishamuddin, Daphne Teck Ching Lai, Asmah Husaini, Lisa Nurhasanah, Adam Glowacz, Gusti Ahmad Fanshuri Alfarisy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wahyu CaesarendraFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0002-9784-4204
Taufiq Aiman HishamuddinFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.
Daphne Teck Ching LaiInstitute of Applied Data Analytics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-8941
Asmah HusainiInstitute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.
Lisa NurhasanahPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia.
Adam GlowaczDepartment of Automatic Control and Robotics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Automatics, Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-7083
Gusti Ahmad Fanshuri AlfarisyDepartment of Informatics, Kalimantan Institute of Technology, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM. 15, Balikpapan 76127, Indonesia.

Funding

Universiti Brunei Darussalam UBD/RSCH/1.11/FICBF(b)/2019/002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an automatic ECG signal classification system that applied the Deep Learning (DL) model to classify four types of ECG signals. In the first part of our work, we present the model development. Four different classes of ECG signals from the PhysioNet open-source database were selected and used. This preliminary study used a Deep Learning (DL) technique namely Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to classify and predict the ECG signals from four different classes: normal, sudden death, arrhythmia, and supraventricular arrhythmia. The classification and prediction process includes pulse extraction, image reshaping, training dataset, and testing process. In general, the training accuracy achieved up to 95% after 100 epochs. However, the prediction of each ECG single type shows a differentiation. Among the four classes, the results show that the predictions for sudden death ECG waveforms are the highest, i.e., 80 out of 80 samples are correct (100% accuracy). In contrast, the lowest is the prediction for normal sinus ECG waveforms, i.e., 74 out of 80 samples are correct (92.5% accuracy). This is due to the image features of normal sinus ECG waveforms being almost similar to the image features of supraventricular arrhythmia ECG waveforms. However, the model has been tuned to achieve an optimal prediction. In the second part, we presented the hardware implementation with the predictive model embedded in an NVIDIA Jetson Nanoprocessor for the online and real-time classification of ECG waveforms.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)deep learningECG images classificationECG online prediction

Identifiers

PMID35453842
PMCPMC9033157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.