Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453777›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Reliability and Validity of the Athletic Shoulder (ASH) Test Performed Using Portable Isometric-Based Strength Training Device.

Aleksandra Królikowska, Anna Mika, Bartosz Plaskota, Maciej Daszkiewicz, Monika Kentel, Anna Kołcz, Maciej Kentel, Robert Prill, Dorota Diakowska, Paweł Reichert and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra KrólikowskaErgonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-5500
Anna MikaInstitute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-5091
Bartosz PlaskotaErgonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Maciej DaszkiewiczErgonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Monika KenteleMKaMED Medical Center, 53-110 Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna KołczErgonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Maciej KenteleMKaMED Medical Center, 53-110 Wroclaw, Poland.
Robert PrillCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, 14770 Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4916-1206
Dorota DiakowskaDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Paweł ReichertDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-4950
Artur StolarczykOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-8153
Łukasz OleksyOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-0554
Wroclaw Medical University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLRzeszów University of Technology · PLUniversitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DEUniversity School of Physical Education in Kraków · PL

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland SUBZ.E060.22.099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Athletic Shoulder (ASH) test was introduced as a tool for quantifying the ability to produce and transfer force across the shoulder girdle. Whether using the portable isometric-based strength training device Active5™ is a reliable alternative to a gold standard force plate for ASH testing purposes remains unknown; therefore, the present study determined the reliability and validity of Active5™ usage in the ASH test compared to force plates. Fifty-one healthy participants performed the ASH test using Active5™ and K-Force plates in three separate sessions. The maximal force was measured bilaterally in a prone position at three shoulder abduction angles, precisely at 180°, 135°, and 90°. The first rater carried out the first and third sessions, spaced at a one-week interval. A second rater performed the second session. The reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The linear Pearson's correlation coefficient (

Indexed as

Active5biomedical monitoringforce platesinjury preventionphysiotherapyrehabilitationsports medicineupper limb

Identifiers

PMID35453777
PMCPMC9024613
OpenAlexW4223610603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.