Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453745›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

A Multi-Site Assessment of Anesthetic Overdose, Hypothermic Shock, and Electrical Stunning as Methods of Euthanasia for Zebrafish (

Jean-Philippe Mocho, Florian Lang, Guillaume Valentin, Sébastien Bedu, Robin McKimm, Juan Ramos, Yolanda Saavedra Torres, Sarah E Wheatley, Joseph Higgins, Mollie E Millington and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Jean-Philippe MochoJoint Production System Ltd., Potters Bar EN6 3DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-6867
Florian LangCenter of PhenoGenomics, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Guillaume ValentinCenter of PhenoGenomics, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4596-6282
Sébastien BeduZebrafish Neurogenetics Unit, Institut Pasteur, UMR3738, CNRS, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-3014
Robin McKimmElectro Fishing Services Ltd., Donaghadee BT21 0LN, UK.
Juan RamosCellular Biology, Physiology and Immunology Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-7268
Yolanda Saavedra TorresThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Sarah E WheatleyThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Joseph HigginsThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Mollie E MillingtonThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Pia Rengtved LundegaardDepartment of Biomedical sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1017 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8284-1844
Rubén Chamorro ValverdeInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 36208 Vigo, Spain.
Vlasta JenčičInstitute of Pathology, Wild Animals, Fish and Bees, University of Ljubljana-Veterinary Faculty, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristine von KroghVon Krogh Consult, 1266 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4886-9699
The Francis Crick Institute · GBÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESPotters Bar Community Hospital · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Euthanasia in zebrafish (Danio rerio) younger than 5 days post fertilization (dpf) is poorly described in the literature, and standardized protocols are lacking, most likely because larvae not capable of independent feeding are often not protected under national legislations. We assessed the euthanasia efficacy in laboratories in different countries of a one hour anesthetic overdose immersion with buffered lidocaine hydrochloride (1 g/L, with or without 50 mL/L of ethanol), buffered tricaine (1 g/L), clove oil (0.1%), benzocaine (1 g/L), or 2-phenoxyethanol (3 mL/L), as well as the efficacy of hypothermic shock (one hour immersion) and electrical stunning (for one minute), on zebrafish at <12 h post fertilization (hpf), 24 hpf, and 4 dpf. Based on the survival/recovery rates 24 h after treatment, the most effective methods were clove oil, lidocaine with ethanol, and electrical stunning. For 4 dpf larvae, signs of aversion during treatment demonstrated that all anesthetics, except lidocaine, induced aversive behavior. Therefore, the most suited euthanasic treatment was lidocaine hydrochloride 1 g/L, buffered with 2 g/L of sodium bicarbonate and mixed with 50 mL/L of ethanol, which euthanized both embryos and larvae in an efficient and stress-free manner. Electrical stunning also euthanized embryos and larvae efficiently and without signs of aversion; this method needs further assessment in other laboratories to draw firm conclusions.

Indexed as

anesthesiabenzocaineclove oilDanio rerioelectrical stunningeuthanasiahypothermic shocklidocainetricainezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35453745
PMCPMC9027676
OpenAlexW4224308119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.