Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453691›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Plant Resources among Five Ethnic Groups in the Western Himalayan Region of Jammu and Kashmir.

Shiekh Marifatul Haq, Musheerul Hassan, Rainer W Bussmann, Eduardo Soares Calixto, Inayat Ur Rahman, Shazia Sakhi, Farhana Ijaz, Abeer Hashem, Al-Bandari Fahad Al-Arjani, Khalid F Almutairi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Standard medical ethnobotany of Kohistan, North Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shiekh Marifatul HaqDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar 190006, India.
Musheerul HassanIslamia College of Science and Commerce, Srinagar 190002, India.
Rainer W BussmannDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-5273
Eduardo Soares CalixtoInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3617-2464
Inayat Ur RahmanDepartment of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra 21300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3312-7975
Shazia SakhiCenter of Plant Sciences and Biodiversity, University of Swat, Swat 19200, Pakistan.
Farhana IjazDepartment of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra 21300, Pakistan.
Abeer HashemBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Bandari Fahad Al-ArjaniBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid F AlmutairiDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-4241
Elsayed Fathi Abd AllahDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-8953
Muhammad Abdul AzizDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venezia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-771X
Niaz AliDepartment of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra 21300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3814-5531

Funding

King Saud University RSP-2021/356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant resources have always been valuable in human life, and many plant species are used in medicine, food, and ritual, and resource utilization is closely related to cultural diversity. Our study was conducted from June 2019 to April 2021, during which we aimed to document the local knowledge of plant resources of five ethnic groups, i.e., the Gujjar, Bakarwal, Kashmiri, Pahari, and Dogra communities of the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) region, Western Himalayas. Through semi-structured interviews (N = 342) and group discussions (N = 38), we collected data on the ethnobotanical uses of plant resources. The data was subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis and ordination techniques (Principal Component Analysis) via, R software of version 4.0.0. Traditional uses were classified into three groups, i.e., single-, double-, and multi-use groups. The study recorded a total of 127 plant species, belonging to 113 genera and distributed among 64 botanical families. The dominant plant families were the Asteraceae, with 8% of all species, followed by Lamiaceae (6%), Polygonaceae (5%) and Ranunculaceae (4%). The recorded plant taxa were frequently used for medicine (51.4% responses), followed by food (14.9%), and fodder (9.5%). Principal component analysis (PCA) separated three groups of provisioning services depending on plant consumption preference levels. Comparative analysis showed remarkable similarities in plant uses (food, medicinal) among the Gujjar and Bakarwal ethnic groups, as both groups share a common culture. Some plants like

Indexed as

conservationethnic groupsethno-usage patternVenn diagramWestern Himalayas

Identifiers

PMID35453691
PMCPMC9032642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.