Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453552›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Using Machine Learning to Develop and Validate an In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Suspected Sepsis.

Hsiao-Yun Chao, Chin-Chieh Wu, Avichandra Singh, Andrew Shedd, Jon Wolfshohl, Eric H Chou, Yhu-Chering Huang, Kuan-Fu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hsiao-Yun ChaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Shin Street, Gueishan Village, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan.
Chin-Chieh WuClinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Avichandra SinghDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan.
Andrew SheddDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Jon WolfshohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Eric H ChouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Yhu-Chering HuangDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Shin Street, Gueishan Village, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-8953
Kuan-Fu ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Shin Street, Gueishan Village, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-9497

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan CMRPG2H0323Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan CMRPG2K0211Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan CMRPG2K0241Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 109-2314-B-182-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly recognition of sepsis and the prediction of mortality in patients with infection are important. This multi-center, ED-based study aimed to develop and validate a 28-day mortality prediction model for patients with infection using various machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsPatients with acute infection requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment during the first 24 h of admission were prospectively recruited. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory test data, selected sepsis-related novel biomarkers, and 28-day mortality were collected and divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Logistic regression and seven ML algorithms were used to develop the prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare different models.

resultsA total of 555 patients were recruited with a full panel of biomarker tests. Among them, 18% fulfilled Sepsis-3 criteria, with a 28-day mortality rate of 8%. The wrapper algorithm selected 30 features, including disease severity scores, biochemical parameters, and conventional and few sepsis-related biomarkers. Random forest outperformed other ML models (AUROC: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98) and SOFA and early warning scores (AUROC: 0.64-0.84) in the prediction of 28-day mortality in patients with infection. Additionally, random forest remained the best-performing model, with an AUROC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98,

conclusionsOur results demonstrated that ML models provide a more accurate prediction of 28-day mortality with an enhanced ability in dealing with multi-dimensional data than the logistic regression model.

Indexed as

biomarkerlogistic regressionmachine learningmortality predictionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID35453552
PMCPMC9030924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.