Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453234›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal.

Femke Goormans, Ruxandra Coropciuc, Maximilien Vercruysse, Isabel Spriet, Robin Willaert, Constantinus Politis

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Femke GoormansDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Sint-Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ruxandra CoropciucDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Sint-Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Maximilien VercruysseDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Sint-Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1490-5850
Isabel SprietDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Robin WillaertDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Sint-Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Constantinus PolitisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Sint-Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4772-9897
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection after maxillofacial trauma remains an important complication, with a significant socio-economic impact. While consensus exists that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection in the management of maxillofacial fractures, the type, and duration remain controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the current evidence that supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures. A comprehensive literature search on 1 January 2022, in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, revealed 16 articles. Most studies focused on the duration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis and compared a one-day to a five-day regimen. Included studies showed considerable variability in design and research aims, which rendered them difficult to compare. Furthermore, a variety of antibiotic regimens were used, and most studies had a short follow-up period and unclear outcome parameters. This scoping review demonstrates the lack of well-constructed studies investigating the type and duration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of maxillofacial trauma. Based on the included articles, prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis over 24 h for surgically treated fractures does not appear to be beneficial. Furthermore, there is no evidence for its use in conservatively treated fractures. These results should be interpreted with caution since all included studies had limitations.

Indexed as

anti-bacterial agentsantibiotic prophylaxisbone fracturesinfectionsmaxillofacial injuries

Identifiers

PMID35453234
PMCPMC9027173
OpenAlexW4224308401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.